Wednesday, February 17, 2016

FINAL RESULTS FEB 2016

Dear all,
Please find below the final results for my class.
Should you find that some of your work is not accounted for, send it to me once again with a screen shot/capture (use "prt sc" key on your keyboard) of the "sent messages" box in your email account as proof.
Please note that 50% attendance (and compensating essay where needed) and the reading notes have been prerequisites for a pass (as announced in class and on the course website). Be sure to redress this for your next attempt to procure a pass.
Our meetings have been a real pleasure to me. I thank you and wish you plenty of success in your future pursuits.
Bogdan Stefanescu

Name
Attend.
In-class Perf.
Read. Notes
Short Essay
Final Essay
End Result
Remarks
Alexandru Roxana
1
0
0
0
FAIL
insuffic.attendance, no assignments
Asaftei Loredana
9
0,33
10
9
8,5
9
loose structure of argum.in final essay
Casagrande Juliana
9
0,33
9
10
9
9
abundant historical data and narrative account not always relevant to the ideological and rhetorical construction of the Scottish nation
Chircu Bogdan
1
0
0
0
FAIL
insuffic.attendance, no assignments
Ciontu Flavia
3
9
7
8,5
8
sketchy and confusing outline of liberalism, no clarification of its relat.with radicalism
Danau Diana
3
6
6
5,5
5
simplistic critical approach in the final essay
Dragomir Cezara
8
1
8
8,5
9,5
10

Floroaica Cristina
8
-0,33
5
8
6
7
final essay speaks of a utopian society, not a nation/national identity; reading notes are a mere list of copied and pasted quotes.
Ghergus Ionela
5
0,25
8,5
7
8
8
long essay-no clear reference to a nation (British or other), not sure what kind o society this is (hardly anarchist)
Giurgiu Teodora
8
1,5
7,5
9
9
10

Haican Mihaela
4
0,33
0
6
5,5
FAIL
insuffic.attendance, no compensating essay, no reading notes; long essay: feeble conceptual frame, too much narrative
Hanaa Bajilan
7
-0,33
6
1
1
FAIL
PLAGIARIZED both essays
Ionita Raluca
6
9
9
8,5
8
methodical but not convincing analysis/examples
Nae Anamaria
2
-0,33
0
0
0
FAIL
insuffic.attendance, no assignments
Ochiana Raluca
8
6
7,5
8,5
8

Patrascanu Karina
8
1,5
9
9
9,5
10
In-class presentation (bonus points)
Petcu Alina Georgiana
6
8,5
8,5
9
9

Petrescu Adriana Maria
8
1
9
9
9
10

Pirvan Cristina Alina
7
0,66
9
9,5
9
9

Pogea Andrei
9
1,5
8,5
9
9
10

Raducan Izabela
1
-0,33
0
8
7
FAIL
insuffic.attendance, no compensating essay, no reading notes; long essay: not related to construction of a national image
Rosca Ionut Alexandru
4
0,33
6
8
6
FAIL
no compensatory essay; just 4 titles in the reading notes; long essay: methodologically confused and inaccurate
Savescu Roxana Valeria
9
1,5
6
9,5
9,5
10
v.sketchy reading notes
Sfedu Biatrice
8
0,5
0
6
7,5
FAIL
no reading notes
Shao Shuangjze
4
-0,33
0
0
0
FAIL
insuffic.attendance, no assignments
Stefanescu Anca
9
0,5
0
0
0
FAIL
insuffic.attendance, no assignments
Tirica Maria
9
1
8,5
9
9
10
In-class presentation (bonus points), reading notes are mostly a list of copied and pasted quotes.
Tudor Andreea Camelia
2
0
0
0
FAIL
insuffic.attendance, no assignments
Udescu Andreea
7
8,5
8
8
8
long essay - disconnected theoretical claims and textual illustration
Visoschi Isadora
3
9
9,5
9,5
9

Voicu Laura
7
9
9
8
8
long essay: no reference to nation (not state/authority) construction, reversed demonstr. (how that community is constructed in a not anarchist way)
Wang Xin
2
-0,33
0
0
0
FAIL
insuffic.attendance, no assignments
Yang Ling
5
0,33
5
3
3
FAIL
long essay: illegible, no discursive or ideological analysis, PLAGIARIZED fragments, no academic format & style; short essay: no personal pronouncements, just a series of quotes and some PLAGIARIZED "comments"; v. few and sketchy reading notes